Saturday, August 6, 2011
Time for Change
Thursday, May 12, 2011
Reclaiming the higher moral ground
Pembela has to come off its high horse, restrategise and leave its perceived xenophobia. Its recent forum which was poorly attended despite huge publicity should sound a warning bell for its continued relevance. Pembela has to reclaim the higher moral ground. It cannot rely and hang on to the shrills and thrills of the bigoted and jingoistic Perkasa's inflammatory bandwagon. Perkasa's modus operandi of blowing up hot air, severe alarmism and extreme hollers achieves nothing for the community. Perkasa's agenda seems only to be scaring Malays and Muslims into becoming a besieged community ever paranoid distrusting everyone except its ever scheming and corrupted leaders. Perkasa makes it its only goal of not wanting Malays to change.
Pembela cannot be associated with lies and deception just because it believes it is fighting for a good cause. Pembela must side with justice and uphold truthfulness. If not, the Muslims it represents, the people's hope and our trust is put in bad light.
Pembela has just cause and genuine concern which Muslims cherish and support. However, it must not betray this faith by being a pliant political accomplice of an ailing and desperate ruling regime. Pembela has to remain upright, honest and true to its noble spirit without fear or favour.
Pembela should not have defended Utusan's inexcusable diatribes and irresponsible racist spins especially the latest mischievous attempt at Christian baiting. Pembela should be above such low journalistic morals and it must spurn gutter politics. Such despicable newspaper reports and followed by upsetting shoddy reactions only afford Christians a higher moral ground, gives them stronger resolve and unfortunately shows up as further evidence of their perceived persecution.
Utusan's persistent lies and slander must come to an end. Pembela should not tie its fate to such misguided purveyors of doom, mischief and disorder.
Friday, June 5, 2009
Obama's Offer of a New Beginning

You have got to admit that President Obama’s speech is impressive. It was so well rehearsed and orchestrated, almost without flaws. He touched base with the middle ground, weaving through the seven issues highlighting his concern and depth in showing his hope in confronting these academically. He preached co-existence and mutual understanding. He even used Islamic terms, concepts and quoted a sprinkling of quranic translations. As if to preempt skeptics, he purposely declared that a speech can never tackle all the complexities but he promises a beginning.
This is new and quite groundbreaking for any US or Western leader to acknowledge and address directly the concerns of the Muslim world in a language of dialogue and in trying to speak as one of their own.Shall he deliver minding the powerful Israeli lobby, the prejudice in the West and the skepticism of Americans themselves?
His speech was delivered in a typically repressive Muslim country where Arabs hold their leaders and themselves in contempt.
For starters, he should begin by deescalating the war in Pakistan, withdraw from Afghanistan and not see resistance as violent extremism, the new euphemism. His words are worthless to the victims of the Swat tragedy which is ongoing even as he speaks of peace.We shall remain weary of such promises however eloquent and charismatic his words. Still he sounds far better than Bush!
Points to ponder from his speech:
He acknowledges civilization's debt, cultural and scientific contributions to Islam.
He did not use the word terror or terrorists preferring the more generalized term, extremist and violence.
He urges the world to avert and avoid stereotyping Muslims, in turn perceiving and profiling one another. This spells good news in confronting and getting rid of Islamophobia.
He mentioned and treated with respect the prophets Moses, Jesus and Muhammad by saying the salutations (peace be upon them).
He mentioned Hamas without the usual equating it with terror. Instead he recognizes their popularity but urges them to refrain from armed resistance. (The word resistance was used to Israel’s dismay).
He admits the suffering of the Palestinians in the same breath and line as reminding of the Jewish holocaust (to the consternation of Israel).
He promises to withdraw all US troops from the Muslim countries invaded when they are finished.
He is against torture and still promises to close down Guantanamo.
He mentions publicly his full name as Barack Husein Obama.
He admitted Iraq was a mistake but not in so many words.
He says that he is against all nuclear weapons and is seen to be more receptive towards nuclear energy for Iran.
He admits America’s role in bringing down a democratically elected Iranian government in the 50’s.
He offers dialogue with Iran without preconditions.
He presents a moderate and reasonable view of Muslim women. He does not mock the hijab but almost defends the freedom to don one. He subtly exposes those hostile towards Islam and religion under the pretext of liberalism (Sarkozy’s France may not like this).
He promises engagement and offers sharing in entrepreneurship and economic progress.
He showed unequivocal and categorical support for Israel. He stresses unshaken bonds to Israel and bases it on the Jewish nation’s tragic history. He even urged Hamas to recognize Israel’s right to exist.
He insists that war in Afghanistan and Pakistan is justified in pursuit of the violent extremists responsible for 9/11. Again he uses the same al Qaeda threat line except he studiously avoids the word terrorist.
Tuesday, June 2, 2009
Repression and Obama’s Cairo Speech
Repression and Obama’s Cairo Speech
Obama’s agenda and venture into the Arab and Muslim world brings a lot of promises but so far nothing has really shifted, far from being changed, his catchy election call.
Egyptians are worried that by choosing
Obama is expected to announce Mubarak, the Egyptian leader’s central role and shore up his regime as the bulwark against Iranian interests and promote
Guatanamo is still stuck, Obama could not even release a prisoner held since he was a 12 year old child. His administration is unable to move in closing down this medieval concentration camp and there are many second thoughts, leading Obama to declare that at least a hundred detainees held without trial as lethally dangerous people. He is still echoing Bush era pronouncements made outside the ambit of law and justice. The other black sites such as Bagram,
Obama has backtracked in the release of all the documents, the shocking and devastating photographs of torture and abuse in Abu Ghraib. These photographs were held back and are being contested by the Bush administration and seem to be ratified by Obama’s new administration. The real reason is not the expected Muslim anger worldwide. Muslims are being abused, tortured, kidnapped and killed worldwide already. Such photographs are only documenting what is really happening as the images of loss of life and limb of Muslims are becoming anesthetized and insensitive. Humanity at large is being deadened and unfeeling towards the sufferings and brutality inflicted even upon Muslim women and children. People are being conditioned and dehumanized in a large and unprecedented scale and all that is being remembered or highlighted is the Holocaust of World War II.
The Obama administration has been on the defensive over its refusal to release the pictures, which were gathered as part of
His decision to surge the military operations in
Obama has not stopped the
In the eyes of the Muslim world, Obama has not changed a thing.